Is Last Layer Re-Training Truly Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlations?

Phuong Quynh Le, Jörg Schlötterer, Christin Seifert
8/1/2023
cs.LGcs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Models trained with empirical risk minimization (ERM) are known to learn to rely on spurious features, i.e., their prediction is based on undesired auxiliary features which are strongly correlated with class labels but lack causal reasoning. This behavior particularly degrades accuracy in groups of samples of the correlated class that are missing the spurious feature or samples of the opposite class but with the spurious feature present. The recently proposed Deep Feature Reweighting (DFR) method improves accuracy of these worst groups. Based on the main argument that ERM mods can learn core features sufficiently well, DFR only needs to retrain the last layer of the classification model with a small group-balanced data set. In this work, we examine the applicability of DFR to realistic data in the medical domain. Furthermore, we investigate the reasoning behind the effectiveness of last-layer retraining and show that even though DFR has the potential to improve the accuracy of the worst group, it remains susceptible to spurious correlations.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{le2023last,
  title  = {Is Last Layer Re-Training Truly Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlations?},
  author = {Phuong Quynh Le and Jörg Schlötterer and Christin Seifert},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2308.00473},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.00473v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.00473.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.00473)

Discussion