Circumventing Concept Erasure Methods For Text-to-Image Generative Models

Minh Pham, Kelly O. Marshall, C. Hegde
2/12/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: NYU-DICE-Lab/circumventing-concept-erasure (23 stars, last commit 2026-02-05).

Abstract

Text-to-image generative models can produce photo-realistic images for an extremely broad range of concepts, and their usage has proliferated widely among the general public. On the flip side, these models have numerous drawbacks, including their potential to generate images featuring sexually explicit content, mirror artistic styles without permission, or even hallucinate (or deepfake) the likenesses of celebrities. Consequently, various methods have been proposed in order to"erase"sensitive concepts from text-to-image models. In this work, we examine five recently proposed concept erasure methods, and show that targeted concepts are not fully excised from any of these methods. Specifically, we leverage the existence of special learned word embeddings that can retrieve"erased"concepts from the sanitized models with no alterations to their weights. Our results highlight the brittleness of post hoc concept erasure methods, and call into question their use in the algorithmic toolkit for AI safety.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

232Shell, PythonJul 30, 20238 months ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{pham2026circumventing,
  title  = {Circumventing Concept Erasure Methods For Text-to-Image Generative Models},
  author = {Minh Pham and Kelly O. Marshall and C. Hegde},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2308.01508},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2308.01508},
  journal = {ICLR 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.01508.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.01508)

Discussion