Improving the Generalization Ability in Essay Coherence Evaluation through Monotonic Constraints

Chen Zheng, Huan Zhang, Yan Zhao, Yuxuan Lai
7/25/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Coherence is a crucial aspect of evaluating text readability and can be assessed through two primary factors when evaluating an essay in a scoring scenario. The first factor is logical coherence, characterized by the appropriate use of discourse connectives and the establishment of logical relationships between sentences. The second factor is the appropriateness of punctuation, as inappropriate punctuation can lead to confused sentence structure. To address these concerns, we propose a coherence scoring model consisting of a regression model with two feature extractors: a local coherence discriminative model and a punctuation correction model. We employ gradient-boosting regression trees as the regression model and impose monotonicity constraints on the input features. The results show that our proposed model better generalizes unseen data. The model achieved third place in track 1 of NLPCC 2023 shared task 7. Additionally, we briefly introduce our solution for the remaining tracks, which achieves second place for track 2 and first place for both track 3 and track 4.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zheng2023improving,
  title  = {Improving the Generalization Ability in Essay Coherence Evaluation through Monotonic Constraints},
  author = {Chen Zheng and Huan Zhang and Yan Zhao and Yuxuan Lai},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2308.02506},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02506v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.02506.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.02506)

Discussion