A Cross-Domain Evaluation of Approaches for Causal Knowledge Extraction

Anik Saha, Oktie Hassanzadeh, Alex Gittens, Jian Ni, Kavitha Srinivas +1 more
8/7/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Causal knowledge extraction is the task of extracting relevant causes and effects from text by detecting the causal relation. Although this task is important for language understanding and knowledge discovery, recent works in this domain have largely focused on binary classification of a text segment as causal or non-causal. In this regard, we perform a thorough analysis of three sequence tagging models for causal knowledge extraction and compare it with a span based approach to causality extraction. Our experiments show that embeddings from pre-trained language models (e.g. BERT) provide a significant performance boost on this task compared to previous state-of-the-art models with complex architectures. We observe that span based models perform better than simple sequence tagging models based on BERT across all 4 data sets from diverse domains with different types of cause-effect phrases.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{saha2023crossdomain,
  title  = {A Cross-Domain Evaluation of Approaches for Causal Knowledge Extraction},
  author = {Anik Saha and Oktie Hassanzadeh and Alex Gittens and Jian Ni and Kavitha Srinivas and Bulent Yener},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2308.03891},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03891v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.03891.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.03891)

Discussion