Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Driving

Michael Hoss
8/14/2023
cs.CVcs.RO

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

The object perception of automated driving systems must pass quality and robustness tests before a safe deployment. Such tests typically identify true positive (TP), false-positive (FP), and false-negative (FN) detections and aggregate them to metrics. Since the literature seems to be lacking a comprehensive way to define the identification of TPs/FPs/FNs, this paper provides a checklist of relevant functional aspects and implementation details. Besides labeling policies of the test set, we cover areas of vision, occlusion handling, safety-relevant areas, matching criteria, temporal and probabilistic issues, and further aspects. Even though the checklist cannot be fully formalized, it can help practitioners minimize the ambiguity of their tests, which, in turn, makes statements on object perception more reliable and comparable.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{hoss2023checklist,
  title  = {Checklist to Define the Identification of TP, FP, and FN Object Detections in Automated Driving},
  author = {Michael Hoss},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2308.07106},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.07106v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.07106.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.07106)

Discussion