Interpretable Image Quality Assessment via CLIP with Multiple Antonym-Prompt Pairs

Takamichi Miyata
8/24/2023
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

No reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) is a task to estimate the perceptual quality of an image without its corresponding original image. It is even more difficult to perform this task in a zero-shot manner, i.e., without task-specific training. In this paper, we propose a new zero-shot and interpretable NRIQA method that exploits the ability of a pre-trained visionlanguage model to estimate the correlation between an image and a textual prompt. The proposed method employs a prompt pairing strategy and multiple antonym-prompt pairs corresponding to carefully selected descriptive features corresponding to the perceptual image quality. Thus, the proposed method is able to identify not only the perceptual quality evaluation of the image, but also the cause on which the quality evaluation is based. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms existing zero-shot NR-IQA methods in terms of accuracy and can evaluate the causes of perceptual quality degradation.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{miyata2023interpretable,
  title  = {Interpretable Image Quality Assessment via CLIP with Multiple Antonym-Prompt Pairs},
  author = {Takamichi Miyata},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2308.13094},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.13094v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2308.13094.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2308.13094)

Discussion