Empirical Risk Minimization for Losses without Variance

Guanhua Fang, Ping Li, Gennady Samorodnitsky
9/7/2023
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

This paper considers an empirical risk minimization problem under heavy-tailed settings, where data does not have finite variance, but only has $p$-th moment with $p \in (1,2)$. Instead of using estimation procedure based on truncated observed data, we choose the optimizer by minimizing the risk value. Those risk values can be robustly estimated via using the remarkable Catoni's method (Catoni, 2012). Thanks to the structure of Catoni-type influence functions, we are able to establish excess risk upper bounds via using generalized generic chaining methods. Moreover, we take computational issues into consideration. We especially theoretically investigate two types of optimization methods, robust gradient descent algorithm and empirical risk-based methods. With an extensive numerical study, we find that the optimizer based on empirical risks via Catoni-style estimation indeed shows better performance than other baselines. It indicates that estimation directly based on truncated data may lead to unsatisfactory results.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{fang2023empirical,
  title  = {Empirical Risk Minimization for Losses without Variance},
  author = {Guanhua Fang and Ping Li and Gennady Samorodnitsky},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.03818},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03818v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.03818.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.03818)

Discussion