Mixtures of Gaussians are Privately Learnable with a Polynomial Number of Samples

Mohammad Afzali, Hassan Ashtiani, Christopher Liaw
9/7/2023
stat.MLcs.CRcs.DS

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study the problem of estimating mixtures of Gaussians under the constraint of differential privacy (DP). Our main result is that $\text{poly}(k,d,1/α,1/\varepsilon,\log(1/δ))$ samples are sufficient to estimate a mixture of $k$ Gaussians in $\mathbb{R}^d$ up to total variation distance $α$ while satisfying $(\varepsilon, δ)$-DP. This is the first finite sample complexity upper bound for the problem that does not make any structural assumptions on the GMMs. To solve the problem, we devise a new framework which may be useful for other tasks. On a high level, we show that if a class of distributions (such as Gaussians) is (1) list decodable and (2) admits a "locally small'' cover (Bun et al., 2021) with respect to total variation distance, then the class of its mixtures is privately learnable. The proof circumvents a known barrier indicating that, unlike Gaussians, GMMs do not admit a locally small cover (Aden-Ali et al., 2021b).

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{afzali2023mixtures,
  title  = {Mixtures of Gaussians are Privately Learnable with a Polynomial Number of Samples},
  author = {Mohammad Afzali and Hassan Ashtiani and Christopher Liaw},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.03847},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.03847v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.03847.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.03847)

Discussion