Minuteman: Machine and Human Joining Forces in Meeting Summarization

František Kmječ, Ondřej Bojar
9/11/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Many meetings require creating a meeting summary to keep everyone up to date. Creating minutes of sufficient quality is however very cognitively demanding. Although we currently possess capable models for both audio speech recognition (ASR) and summarization, their fully automatic use is still problematic. ASR models frequently commit errors when transcribing named entities while the summarization models tend to hallucinate and misinterpret the transcript. We propose a novel tool -- Minuteman -- to enable efficient semi-automatic meeting minuting. The tool provides a live transcript and a live meeting summary to the users, who can edit them in a collaborative manner, enabling correction of ASR errors and imperfect summary points in real time. The resulting application eases the cognitive load of the notetakers and allows them to easily catch up if they missed a part of the meeting due to absence or a lack of focus. We conduct several tests of the application in varied settings, exploring the worthiness of the concept and the possible user strategies.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{kmje2023minuteman,
  title  = {Minuteman: Machine and Human Joining Forces in Meeting Summarization},
  author = {František Kmječ and Ondřej Bojar},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.05272},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05272v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.05272.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.05272)

Discussion