Flesch or Fumble? Evaluating Readability Standard Alignment of Instruction-Tuned Language Models

Joseph Marvin Imperial, Harish Tayyar Madabushi
9/11/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Readability metrics and standards such as Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL) and the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) exist to guide teachers and educators to properly assess the complexity of educational materials before administering them for classroom use. In this study, we select a diverse set of open and closed-source instruction-tuned language models and investigate their performances in writing story completions and simplifying narratives--tasks that teachers perform--using standard-guided prompts controlling text readability. Our extensive findings provide empirical proof of how globally recognized models like ChatGPT may be considered less effective and may require more refined prompts for these generative tasks compared to other open-sourced models such as BLOOMZ and FlanT5--which have shown promising results.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{imperial2023flesch,
  title  = {Flesch or Fumble? Evaluating Readability Standard Alignment of Instruction-Tuned Language Models},
  author = {Joseph Marvin Imperial and Harish Tayyar Madabushi},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.05454},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05454v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.05454.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.05454)

Discussion