Compressive Mahalanobis Metric Learning Adapts to Intrinsic Dimension

Efstratios Palias, Ata Kabán
9/11/2023
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Metric learning aims at finding a suitable distance metric over the input space, to improve the performance of distance-based learning algorithms. In high-dimensional settings, it can also serve as dimensionality reduction by imposing a low-rank restriction to the learnt metric. In this paper, we consider the problem of learning a Mahalanobis metric, and instead of training a low-rank metric on high-dimensional data, we use a randomly compressed version of the data to train a full-rank metric in this reduced feature space. We give theoretical guarantees on the error for Mahalanobis metric learning, which depend on the stable dimension of the data support, but not on the ambient dimension. Our bounds make no assumptions aside from i.i.d. data sampling from a bounded support, and automatically tighten when benign geometrical structures are present. An important ingredient is an extension of Gordon's theorem, which may be of independent interest. We also corroborate our findings by numerical experiments.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{palias2023compressive,
  title  = {Compressive Mahalanobis Metric Learning Adapts to Intrinsic Dimension},
  author = {Efstratios Palias and Ata Kabán},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.05751},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.05751v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.05751.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.05751)

Discussion