Grounded Complex Task Segmentation for Conversational Assistants

Rafael Ferreira, David Semedo, João Magalhães
9/20/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Following complex instructions in conversational assistants can be quite daunting due to the shorter attention and memory spans when compared to reading the same instructions. Hence, when conversational assistants walk users through the steps of complex tasks, there is a need to structure the task into manageable pieces of information of the right length and complexity. In this paper, we tackle the recipes domain and convert reading structured instructions into conversational structured ones. We annotated the structure of instructions according to a conversational scenario, which provided insights into what is expected in this setting. To computationally model the conversational step's characteristics, we tested various Transformer-based architectures, showing that a token-based approach delivers the best results. A further user study showed that users tend to favor steps of manageable complexity and length, and that the proposed methodology can improve the original web-based instructional text. Specifically, 86% of the evaluated tasks were improved from a conversational suitability point of view.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ferreira2023grounded,
  title  = {Grounded Complex Task Segmentation for Conversational Assistants},
  author = {Rafael Ferreira and David Semedo and João Magalhães},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.11271},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.11271v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.11271.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.11271)

Discussion