Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis

Ildikó Pilán, Laurent Prévot, Hendrik Buschmeier, Pierre Lison
9/27/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: NorskRegnesentral/conv_feedback (0 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2024-08-02).

Abstract

Scripted dialogues such as movie and TV subtitles constitute a widespread source of training data for conversational NLP models. However, there are notable linguistic differences between these dialogues and spontaneous interactions, especially regarding the occurrence of communicative feedback such as backchannels, acknowledgments, or clarification requests. This paper presents a quantitative analysis of such feedback phenomena in both subtitles and spontaneous conversations. Based on conversational data spanning eight languages and multiple genres, we extract lexical statistics, classifications from a dialogue act tagger, expert annotations and labels derived from a fine-tuned Large Language Model (LLM). Our main empirical findings are that (1) communicative feedback is markedly less frequent in subtitles than in spontaneous dialogues and (2) subtitles contain a higher proportion of negative feedback. We also show that dialogues generated by standard LLMs lie much closer to scripted dialogues than spontaneous interactions in terms of communicative feedback.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Apache-2.0
00Aug 2, 20242 years agoApache-2.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{piln2023conversational,
  title  = {Conversational Feedback in Scripted versus Spontaneous Dialogues: A Comparative Analysis},
  author = {Ildikó Pilán and Laurent Prévot and Hendrik Buschmeier and Pierre Lison},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2309.15656},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2309.15656v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2309.15656.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2309.15656)

Discussion