Content Bias in Deep Learning Image Age Approximation: A new Approach Towards better Explainability

Robert Jöchl, Andreas Uhl
10/3/2023
cs.CVcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In the context of temporal image forensics, it is not evident that a neural network, trained on images from different time-slots (classes), exploits solely image age related features. Usually, images taken in close temporal proximity (e.g., belonging to the same age class) share some common content properties. Such content bias can be exploited by a neural network. In this work, a novel approach is proposed that evaluates the influence of image content. This approach is verified using synthetic images (where content bias can be ruled out) with an age signal embedded. Based on the proposed approach, it is shown that a deep learning approach proposed in the context of age classification is most likely highly dependent on the image content. As a possible countermeasure, two different models from the field of image steganalysis, along with three different preprocessing techniques to increase the signal-to-noise ratio (age signal to image content), are evaluated using the proposed method.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{jchl2023content,
  title  = {Content Bias in Deep Learning Image Age Approximation: A new Approach Towards better Explainability},
  author = {Robert Jöchl and Andreas Uhl},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.02067},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.02067v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.02067.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.02067)

Discussion