Binary Classification with Confidence Difference

Wei Wang, Lei Feng, Y. Jiang, Gang Niu, Min-Ling Zhang +1 more
2/12/2026

No official code found. Best implementation: wwangwitsel/ConfDiff (10 stars, last commit 2024-05-13).

Abstract

Recently, learning with soft labels has been shown to achieve better performance than learning with hard labels in terms of model generalization, calibration, and robustness. However, collecting pointwise labeling confidence for all training examples can be challenging and time-consuming in real-world scenarios. This paper delves into a novel weakly supervised binary classification problem called confidence-difference (ConfDiff) classification. Instead of pointwise labeling confidence, we are given only unlabeled data pairs with confidence difference that specifies the difference in the probabilities of being positive. We propose a risk-consistent approach to tackle this problem and show that the estimation error bound achieves the optimal convergence rate. We also introduce a risk correction approach to mitigate overfitting problems, whose consistency and convergence rate are also proven. Extensive experiments on benchmark data sets and a real-world recommender system data set validate the effectiveness of our proposed approaches in exploiting the supervision information of the confidence difference.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

[NeurIPS'23] Binary Classification with Confidence Difference

101PythonOct 5, 20232 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2026binary,
  title  = {Binary Classification with Confidence Difference},
  author = {Wei Wang and Lei Feng and Y. Jiang and Gang Niu and Min-Ling Zhang and Masashi Sugiyama},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2310.05632},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/pdf/2310.05632},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.05632.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.05632)

Discussion