Test & Evaluation Best Practices for Machine Learning-Enabled Systems

Jaganmohan Chandrasekaran, Tyler Cody, Nicola McCarthy, Erin Lanus, Laura Freeman
10/10/2023
cs.SEcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) - based software systems are rapidly gaining adoption across various domains, making it increasingly essential to ensure they perform as intended. This report presents best practices for the Test and Evaluation (T&E) of ML-enabled software systems across its lifecycle. We categorize the lifecycle of ML-enabled software systems into three stages: component, integration and deployment, and post-deployment. At the component level, the primary objective is to test and evaluate the ML model as a standalone component. Next, in the integration and deployment stage, the goal is to evaluate an integrated ML-enabled system consisting of both ML and non-ML components. Finally, once the ML-enabled software system is deployed and operationalized, the T&E objective is to ensure the system performs as intended. Maintenance activities for ML-enabled software systems span the lifecycle and involve maintaining various assets of ML-enabled software systems. Given its unique characteristics, the T&E of ML-enabled software systems is challenging. While significant research has been reported on T&E at the component level, limited work is reported on T&E in the remaining two stages. Furthermore, in many cases, there is a lack of systematic T&E strategies throughout the ML-enabled system's lifecycle. This leads practitioners to resort to ad-hoc T&E practices, which can undermine user confidence in the reliability of ML-enabled software systems. New systematic testing approaches, adequacy measurements, and metrics are required to address the T&E challenges across all stages of the ML-enabled system lifecycle.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chandrasekaran2023test,
  title  = {Test & Evaluation Best Practices for Machine Learning-Enabled Systems},
  author = {Jaganmohan Chandrasekaran and Tyler Cody and Nicola McCarthy and Erin Lanus and Laura Freeman},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.06800},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.06800v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.06800.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.06800)

Discussion