Investigating the Adversarial Robustness of Density Estimation Using the Probability Flow ODE

Marius Arvinte, Cory Cornelius, Jason Martin, Nageen Himayat
10/10/2023
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Beyond their impressive sampling capabilities, score-based diffusion models offer a powerful analysis tool in the form of unbiased density estimation of a query sample under the training data distribution. In this work, we investigate the robustness of density estimation using the probability flow (PF) neural ordinary differential equation (ODE) model against gradient-based likelihood maximization attacks and the relation to sample complexity, where the compressed size of a sample is used as a measure of its complexity. We introduce and evaluate six gradient-based log-likelihood maximization attacks, including a novel reverse integration attack. Our experimental evaluations on CIFAR-10 show that density estimation using the PF ODE is robust against high-complexity, high-likelihood attacks, and that in some cases adversarial samples are semantically meaningful, as expected from a robust estimator.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{arvinte2023investigating,
  title  = {Investigating the Adversarial Robustness of Density Estimation Using the Probability Flow ODE},
  author = {Marius Arvinte and Cory Cornelius and Jason Martin and Nageen Himayat},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.07084},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07084v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.07084.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.07084)

Discussion