The Past, Present and Better Future of Feedback Learning in Large Language Models for Subjective Human Preferences and Values

Hannah Rose Kirk, Andrew M. Bean, Bertie Vidgen, Paul Röttger, Scott A. Hale
10/11/2023
cs.CLcs.CY

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Human feedback is increasingly used to steer the behaviours of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it is unclear how to collect and incorporate feedback in a way that is efficient, effective and unbiased, especially for highly subjective human preferences and values. In this paper, we survey existing approaches for learning from human feedback, drawing on 95 papers primarily from the ACL and arXiv repositories.First, we summarise the past, pre-LLM trends for integrating human feedback into language models. Second, we give an overview of present techniques and practices, as well as the motivations for using feedback; conceptual frameworks for defining values and preferences; and how feedback is collected and from whom. Finally, we encourage a better future of feedback learning in LLMs by raising five unresolved conceptual and practical challenges.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kirk2023past,
  title  = {The Past, Present and Better Future of Feedback Learning in Large Language Models for Subjective Human Preferences and Values},
  author = {Hannah Rose Kirk and Andrew M. Bean and Bertie Vidgen and Paul Röttger and Scott A. Hale},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.07629},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.07629v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.07629.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.07629)

Discussion