Empirical study of pretrained multilingual language models for zero-shot cross-lingual knowledge transfer in generation

Nadezhda Chirkova, Sheng Liang, Vassilina Nikoulina
10/15/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Zero-shot cross-lingual knowledge transfer enables the multilingual pretrained language model (mPLM), finetuned on a task in one language, make predictions for this task in other languages. While being broadly studied for natural language understanding tasks, the described setting is understudied for generation. Previous works notice a frequent problem of generation in a wrong language and propose approaches to address it, usually using mT5 as a backbone model. In this work, we test alternative mPLMs, such as mBART and NLLB-200, considering full finetuning and parameter-efficient finetuning with adapters. We find that mBART with adapters performs similarly to mT5 of the same size, and NLLB-200 can be competitive in some cases. We also underline the importance of tuning learning rate used for finetuning, which helps to alleviate the problem of generation in the wrong language.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chirkova2023empirical,
  title  = {Empirical study of pretrained multilingual language models for zero-shot cross-lingual knowledge transfer in generation},
  author = {Nadezhda Chirkova and Sheng Liang and Vassilina Nikoulina},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.09917},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09917v3}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.09917.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.09917)

Discussion