False Discovery Proportion control for aggregated Knockoffs

Alexandre Blain, B. Thirion, O. Grisel, P. Neuvial
10/1/2023

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Controlled variable selection is an important analytical step in various scientific fields, such as brain imaging or genomics. In these high-dimensional data settings, considering too many variables leads to poor models and high costs, hence the need for statistical guarantees on false positives. Knockoffs are a popular statistical tool for conditional variable selection in high dimension. However, they control for the expected proportion of false discoveries (FDR) and not their actual proportion (FDP). We present a new method, KOPI, that controls the proportion of false discoveries for Knockoff-based inference. The proposed method also relies on a new type of aggregation to address the undesirable randomness associated with classical Knockoff inference. We demonstrate FDP control and substantial power gains over existing Knockoff-based methods in various simulation settings and achieve good sensitivity/specificity tradeoffs on brain imaging and genomic data.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{blain2023false,
  title  = {False Discovery Proportion control for aggregated Knockoffs},
  author = {Alexandre Blain and B. Thirion and O. Grisel and P. Neuvial},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.10373},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10373},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.10373.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.10373)

Discussion