IW-GAE: Importance weighted group accuracy estimation for improved calibration and model selection in unsupervised domain adaptation

Taejong Joo, Diego Klabjan
10/1/2023

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Distribution shifts pose significant challenges for model calibration and model selection tasks in the unsupervised domain adaptation problem -- a scenario where the goal is to perform well in a distribution shifted domain without labels. In this work, we tackle difficulties coming from distribution shifts by developing a novel importance weighted group accuracy estimator. Specifically, we present a new perspective of addressing the model calibration and model selection tasks by estimating the group accuracy. Then, we formulate an optimization problem for finding an importance weight that leads to an accurate group accuracy estimation with theoretical analyses. Our extensive experiments show that our approach improves state-of-the-art performances by 22% in the model calibration task and 14% in the model selection task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{joo2023iwgae,
  title  = {IW-GAE: Importance weighted group accuracy estimation for improved calibration and model selection in unsupervised domain adaptation},
  author = {Taejong Joo and Diego Klabjan},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.10611},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.10611},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.10611.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.10611)

Discussion