The Quo Vadis of the Relationship between Language and Large Language Models

Evelina Leivada, Vittoria Dentella, Elliot Murphy
10/17/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In the field of Artificial (General) Intelligence (AI), the several recent advancements in Natural language processing (NLP) activities relying on Large Language Models (LLMs) have come to encourage the adoption of LLMs as scientific models of language. While the terminology employed for the characterization of LLMs favors their embracing as such, it is not clear that they are in a place to offer insights into the target system they seek to represent. After identifying the most important theoretical and empirical risks brought about by the adoption of scientific models that lack transparency, we discuss LLMs relating them to every scientific model's fundamental components: the object, the medium, the meaning and the user. We conclude that, at their current stage of development, LLMs hardly offer any explanations for language, and then we provide an outlook for more informative future research directions on this topic.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{leivada2023vadis,
  title  = {The Quo Vadis of the Relationship between Language and Large Language Models},
  author = {Evelina Leivada and Vittoria Dentella and Elliot Murphy},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.11146},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11146v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.11146.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.11146)

Discussion