Understanding Reward Ambiguity Through Optimal Transport Theory in Inverse Reinforcement Learning

Ali Baheri
10/18/2023
cs.LGeess.SYmath.OC

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In inverse reinforcement learning (IRL), the central objective is to infer underlying reward functions from observed expert behaviors in a way that not only explains the given data but also generalizes to unseen scenarios. This ensures robustness against reward ambiguity where multiple reward functions can equally explain the same expert behaviors. While significant efforts have been made in addressing this issue, current methods often face challenges with high-dimensional problems and lack a geometric foundation. This paper harnesses the optimal transport (OT) theory to provide a fresh perspective on these challenges. By utilizing the Wasserstein distance from OT, we establish a geometric framework that allows for quantifying reward ambiguity and identifying a central representation or centroid of reward functions. These insights pave the way for robust IRL methodologies anchored in geometric interpretations, offering a structured approach to tackle reward ambiguity in high-dimensional settings.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{baheri2023understanding,
  title  = {Understanding Reward Ambiguity Through Optimal Transport Theory in Inverse Reinforcement Learning},
  author = {Ali Baheri},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.12055},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12055v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.12055.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.12055)

Discussion