Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processing

Yue Guo, Zian Xu, Yi Yang
10/19/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, has revolutionized general natural language preprocessing (NLP) tasks. However, their expertise in the financial domain lacks a comprehensive evaluation. To assess the ability of LLMs to solve financial NLP tasks, we present FinLMEval, a framework for Financial Language Model Evaluation, comprising nine datasets designed to evaluate the performance of language models. This study compares the performance of encoder-only language models and the decoder-only language models. Our findings reveal that while some decoder-only LLMs demonstrate notable performance across most financial tasks via zero-shot prompting, they generally lag behind the fine-tuned expert models, especially when dealing with proprietary datasets. We hope this study provides foundation evaluations for continuing efforts to build more advanced LLMs in the financial domain.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{guo2023chatgpt,
  title  = {Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processing},
  author = {Yue Guo and Zian Xu and Yi Yang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.12664},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12664v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.12664.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.12664)

Discussion