Mean Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy Demands

Syomantak Chaudhuri, Konstantin Miagkov, Thomas A. Courtade
10/19/2023
cs.CRcs.DScs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Differential Privacy (DP) is a well-established framework to quantify privacy loss incurred by any algorithm. Traditional formulations impose a uniform privacy requirement for all users, which is often inconsistent with real-world scenarios in which users dictate their privacy preferences individually. This work considers the problem of mean estimation, where each user can impose their own distinct privacy level. The algorithm we propose is shown to be minimax optimal and has a near-linear run-time. Our results elicit an interesting saturation phenomenon that occurs. Namely, the privacy requirements of the most stringent users dictate the overall error rates. As a consequence, users with less but differing privacy requirements are all given more privacy than they require, in equal amounts. In other words, these privacy-indifferent users are given a nontrivial degree of privacy for free, without any sacrifice in the performance of the estimator.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{chaudhuri2023mean,
  title  = {Mean Estimation Under Heterogeneous Privacy Demands},
  author = {Syomantak Chaudhuri and Konstantin Miagkov and Thomas A. Courtade},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.13137},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.13137v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.13137.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.13137)

Discussion