Establishing Vocabulary Tests as a Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models

Gonzalo Martínez, Javier Conde, Elena Merino-Gómez, Beatriz Bermúdez-Margaretto, José Alberto Hernández +2 more
10/23/2023
cs.CL

No official code found. Best implementation: WordsGPT/LLM_Vocabulary_Evaluation (3 stars, Apache-2.0, last commit 2024-12-13).

Abstract

Vocabulary tests, once a cornerstone of language modeling evaluation, have been largely overlooked in the current landscape of Large Language Models (LLMs) like Llama, Mistral, and GPT. While most LLM evaluation benchmarks focus on specific tasks or domain-specific knowledge, they often neglect the fundamental linguistic aspects of language understanding and production. In this paper, we advocate for the revival of vocabulary tests as a valuable tool for assessing LLM performance. We evaluate seven LLMs using two vocabulary test formats across two languages and uncover surprising gaps in their lexical knowledge. These findings shed light on the intricacies of LLM word representations, their learning mechanisms, and performance variations across models and languages. Moreover, the ability to automatically generate and perform vocabulary tests offers new opportunities to expand the approach and provide a more complete picture of LLMs' language skills.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Apache-2.0
30Jupyter NotebookOct 22, 20231 years agoApache-2.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{martnez2023establishing,
  title  = {Establishing Vocabulary Tests as a Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models},
  author = {Gonzalo Martínez and Javier Conde and Elena Merino-Gómez and Beatriz Bermúdez-Margaretto and José Alberto Hernández and Pedro Reviriego and Marc Brysbaert},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.14703},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14703v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.14703.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.14703)

Discussion