An Efficient Deep Learning-based approach for Recognizing Agricultural Pests in the Wild

Mohtasim Hadi Rafi, Mohammad Ratul Mahjabin, Md Sabbir Rahman
10/25/2023
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

One of the biggest challenges that the farmers go through is to fight insect pests during agricultural product yields. The problem can be solved easily and avoid economic losses by taking timely preventive measures. This requires identifying insect pests in an easy and effective manner. Most of the insect species have similarities between them. Without proper help from the agriculturist academician it is very challenging for the farmers to identify the crop pests accurately. To address this issue we have done extensive experiments considering different methods to find out the best method among all. This paper presents a detailed overview of the experiments done on mainly a robust dataset named IP102 including transfer learning with finetuning, attention mechanism and custom architecture. Some example from another dataset D0 is also shown to show robustness of our experimented techniques.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{rafi2023efficient,
  title  = {An Efficient Deep Learning-based approach for Recognizing Agricultural Pests in the Wild},
  author = {Mohtasim Hadi Rafi and Mohammad Ratul Mahjabin and Md Sabbir Rahman},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.16991},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16991v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.16991.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.16991)

Discussion