Moral Responsibility for AI Systems

Sander Beckers
10/1/2023

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

As more and more decisions that have a significant ethical dimension are being outsourced to AI systems, it is important to have a definition of moral responsibility that can be applied to AI systems. Moral responsibility for an outcome of an agent who performs some action is commonly taken to involve both a causal condition and an epistemic condition: the action should cause the outcome, and the agent should have been aware -- in some form or other -- of the possible moral consequences of their action. This paper presents a formal definition of both conditions within the framework of causal models. I compare my approach to the existing approaches of Braham and van Hees (BvH) and of Halpern and Kleiman-Weiner (HK). I then generalize my definition into a degree of responsibility.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default β€” verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{beckers2023moral,
  title  = {Moral Responsibility for AI Systems},
  author = {Sander Beckers},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2310.18040},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18040},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2310.18040.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2310.18040)

Discussion