Towards Evaluating Transfer-based Attacks Systematically, Practically, and Fairly

Qizhang Li, Yiwen Guo, Wangmeng Zuo, Hao Chen
2/12/2026

Official code: qizhangli/TA-Bench (14 stars, last commit 2024-01-22).

Abstract

The adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs) has drawn great attention due to the security risk of applying these models in real-world applications. Based on transferability of adversarial examples, an increasing number of transfer-based methods have been developed to fool black-box DNN models whose architecture and parameters are inaccessible. Although tremendous effort has been exerted, there still lacks a standardized benchmark that could be taken advantage of to compare these methods systematically, fairly, and practically. Our investigation shows that the evaluation of some methods needs to be more reasonable and more thorough to verify their effectiveness, to avoid, for example, unfair comparison and insufficient consideration of possible substitute/victim models. Therefore, we establish a transfer-based attack benchmark (TA-Bench) which implements 30+ methods. In this paper, we evaluate and compare them comprehensively on 25 popular substitute/victim models on ImageNet. New insights about the effectiveness of these methods are gained and guidelines for future evaluations are provided. Code at: https://github.com/qizhangli/TA-Bench.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Code for our NeurIPS 2023 paper Towards Evaluating Transfer-based Attacks Systematically, Practically, and Fairly

140Shell, PythonMay 12, 20232 years ago

Cite this paper

@article{li2026towards,
  title  = {Towards Evaluating Transfer-based Attacks Systematically, Practically, and Fairly},
  author = {Qizhang Li and Yiwen Guo and Wangmeng Zuo and Hao Chen},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2311.01323},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01323},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.01323.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.01323)

Discussion