Leveraging Language Models to Detect Greenwashing

Avalon Vinella, Margaret Capetz, Rebecca Pattichis, Christina Chance, Reshmi Ghosh +1 more
10/30/2023
cs.CLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

In recent years, climate change repercussions have increasingly captured public interest. Consequently, corporations are emphasizing their environmental efforts in sustainability reports to bolster their public image. Yet, the absence of stringent regulations in review of such reports allows potential greenwashing. In this study, we introduce a novel preliminary methodology to train a language model on generated labels for greenwashing risk. Our primary contributions encompass: developing a preliminary mathematical formulation to quantify greenwashing risk, a fine-tuned ClimateBERT model for this problem, and a comparative analysis of results. On a test set comprising of sustainability reports, our best model achieved an average accuracy score of 86.34% and F1 score of 0.67, demonstrating that our proof-of-concept methodology shows a promising direction of exploration for this task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{vinella2023leveraging,
  title  = {Leveraging Language Models to Detect Greenwashing},
  author = {Avalon Vinella and Margaret Capetz and Rebecca Pattichis and Christina Chance and Reshmi Ghosh and Kai-Wei Chang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.01469},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01469v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.01469.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.01469)

Discussion