Conditions on Preference Relations that Guarantee the Existence of Optimal Policies

Jonathan Colaço Carr, Prakash Panangaden, Doina Precup
11/3/2023
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Learning from Preferential Feedback (LfPF) plays an essential role in training Large Language Models, as well as certain types of interactive learning agents. However, a substantial gap exists between the theory and application of LfPF algorithms. Current results guaranteeing the existence of optimal policies in LfPF problems assume that both the preferences and transition dynamics are determined by a Markov Decision Process. We introduce the Direct Preference Process, a new framework for analyzing LfPF problems in partially-observable, non-Markovian environments. Within this framework, we establish conditions that guarantee the existence of optimal policies by considering the ordinal structure of the preferences. We show that a decision-making problem can have optimal policies -- that are characterized by recursive optimality equations -- even when no reward function can express the learning goal. These findings underline the need to explore preference-based learning strategies which do not assume that preferences are generated by reward.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{carr2023conditions,
  title  = {Conditions on Preference Relations that Guarantee the Existence of Optimal Policies},
  author = {Jonathan Colaço Carr and Prakash Panangaden and Doina Precup},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.01990},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.01990v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.01990.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.01990)

Discussion