On the Second-Order Convergence of Biased Policy Gradient Algorithms

Siqiao Mu, Diego Klabjan
2/12/2026

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 2 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Since the objective functions of reinforcement learning problems are typically highly nonconvex, it is desirable that policy gradient, the most popular algorithm, escapes saddle points and arrives at second-order stationary points. Existing results only consider vanilla policy gradient algorithms with unbiased gradient estimators, but practical implementations under the infinite-horizon discounted reward setting are biased due to finite-horizon sampling. Moreover, actor-critic methods, whose second-order convergence has not yet been established, are also biased due to the critic approximation of the value function. We provide a novel second-order analysis of biased policy gradient methods, including the vanilla gradient estimator computed from Monte-Carlo sampling of trajectories as well as the double-loop actor-critic algorithm, where in the inner loop the critic improves the approximation of the value function via TD(0) learning. Separately, we also establish the convergence of TD(0) on Markov chains irrespective of initial state distribution.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 2 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{mu2026secondorder,
  title  = {On the Second-Order Convergence of Biased Policy Gradient Algorithms},
  author = {Siqiao Mu and Diego Klabjan},
  year   = {2026},
  eprint = {2311.02546},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.02546},
  journal = {ICML 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.02546.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.02546)

Discussion