Equivariance Is Not All You Need: Characterizing the Utility of Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Particle Physics Tasks

Savannah Thais, Daniel Murnane
11/6/2023
cs.LGhep-ex

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 1 possible match can be shown below.

Abstract

Incorporating inductive biases into ML models is an active area of ML research, especially when ML models are applied to data about the physical world. Equivariant Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have recently become a popular method for learning from physics data because they directly incorporate the symmetries of the underlying physical system. Drawing from the relevant literature around group equivariant networks, this paper presents a comprehensive evaluation of the proposed benefits of equivariant GNNs by using real-world particle physics reconstruction tasks as an evaluation test-bed. We demonstrate that many of the theoretical benefits generally associated with equivariant networks may not hold for realistic systems and introduce compelling directions for future research that will benefit both the scientific theory of ML and physics applications.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 1 weaker match is hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{thais2023equivariance,
  title  = {Equivariance Is Not All You Need: Characterizing the Utility of Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Particle Physics Tasks},
  author = {Savannah Thais and Daniel Murnane},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.03094},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.03094v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.03094.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.03094)

Discussion