Robust Best-arm Identification in Linear Bandits

Wei Wang, Sattar Vakili, Ilija Bogunovic
11/8/2023
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We study the robust best-arm identification problem (RBAI) in the case of linear rewards. The primary objective is to identify a near-optimal robust arm, which involves selecting arms at every round and assessing their robustness by exploring potential adversarial actions. This approach is particularly relevant when utilizing a simulator and seeking to identify a robust solution for real-world transfer. To this end, we present an instance-dependent lower bound for the robust best-arm identification problem with linear rewards. Furthermore, we propose both static and adaptive bandit algorithms that achieve sample complexity that matches the lower bound. In synthetic experiments, our algorithms effectively identify the best robust arm and perform similarly to the oracle strategy. As an application, we examine diabetes care and the process of learning insulin dose recommendations that are robust with respect to inaccuracies in standard calculators. Our algorithms prove to be effective in identifying robust dosage values across various age ranges of patients.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{wang2023robust,
  title  = {Robust Best-arm Identification in Linear Bandits},
  author = {Wei Wang and Sattar Vakili and Ilija Bogunovic},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.04731},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04731v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.04731.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.04731)

Discussion