Are cascade dialogue state tracking models speaking out of turn in spoken dialogues?

Lucas Druart, Léo Jacqmin, Benoît Favre, Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona, Valentin Vielzeuf
11/3/2023
cs.CLcs.AIeess.AS

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

In Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD) systems, correctly updating the system's understanding of the user's needs is key to a smooth interaction. Traditionally TOD systems are composed of several modules that interact with one another. While each of these components is the focus of active research communities, their behavior in interaction can be overlooked. This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of the errors of state of the art systems in complex settings such as Dialogue State Tracking which highly depends on the dialogue context. Based on spoken MultiWoz, we identify that errors on non-categorical slots' values are essential to address in order to bridge the gap between spoken and chat-based dialogue systems. We explore potential solutions to improve transcriptions and help dialogue state tracking generative models correct such errors.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{druart2023cascade,
  title  = {Are cascade dialogue state tracking models speaking out of turn in spoken dialogues?},
  author = {Lucas Druart and Léo Jacqmin and Benoît Favre and Lina Maria Rojas-Barahona and Valentin Vielzeuf},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.04922},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.04922v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.04922.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.04922)

Discussion