First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Models

Naomi Saphra, Eve Fleisig, Kyunghyun Cho, Adam Lopez
11/8/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 3 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

Many NLP researchers are experiencing an existential crisis triggered by the astonishing success of ChatGPT and other systems based on large language models (LLMs). After such a disruptive change to our understanding of the field, what is left to do? Taking a historical lens, we look for guidance from the first era of LLMs, which began in 2005 with large $n$-gram models for machine translation (MT). We identify durable lessons from the first era, and more importantly, we identify evergreen problems where NLP researchers can continue to make meaningful contributions in areas where LLMs are ascendant. We argue that disparities in scale are transient and researchers can work to reduce them; that data, rather than hardware, is still a bottleneck for many applications; that meaningful realistic evaluation is still an open problem; and that there is still room for speculative approaches.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 3 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{saphra2023first,
  title  = {First Tragedy, then Parse: History Repeats Itself in the New Era of Large Language Models},
  author = {Naomi Saphra and Eve Fleisig and Kyunghyun Cho and Adam Lopez},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.05020},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.05020v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.05020.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.05020)

Discussion