Exploration via linearly perturbed loss minimisation

David Janz, Shuai Liu, Alex Ayoub, Csaba Szepesvári
11/13/2023
cs.LGstat.ML

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

We introduce exploration via linear loss perturbations (EVILL), a randomised exploration method for structured stochastic bandit problems that works by solving for the minimiser of a linearly perturbed regularised negative log-likelihood function. We show that, for the case of generalised linear bandits, EVILL reduces to perturbed history exploration (PHE), a method where exploration is done by training on randomly perturbed rewards. In doing so, we provide a simple and clean explanation of when and why random reward perturbations give rise to good bandit algorithms. We propose data-dependent perturbations not present in previous PHE-type methods that allow EVILL to match the performance of Thompson-sampling-style parameter-perturbation methods, both in theory and in practice. Moreover, we show an example outside generalised linear bandits where PHE leads to inconsistent estimates, and thus linear regret, while EVILL remains performant. Like PHE, EVILL can be implemented in just a few lines of code.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{janz2023exploration,
  title  = {Exploration via linearly perturbed loss minimisation},
  author = {David Janz and Shuai Liu and Alex Ayoub and Csaba Szepesvári},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.07565},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.07565v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.07565.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.07565)

Discussion