Eval-GCSC: A New Metric for Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Chinese Spelling Correction

Kunting Li, Yong Hu, Shaolei Wang, Hanhan Ma, Liang He +2 more
11/14/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

ChatGPT has demonstrated impressive performance in various downstream tasks. However, in the Chinese Spelling Correction (CSC) task, we observe a discrepancy: while ChatGPT performs well under human evaluation, it scores poorly according to traditional metrics. We believe this inconsistency arises because the traditional metrics are not well-suited for evaluating generative models. Their overly strict length and phonics constraints may lead to underestimating ChatGPT's correction capabilities. To better evaluate generative models in the CSC task, this paper proposes a new evaluation metric: Eval-GCSC. By incorporating word-level and semantic similarity judgments, it relaxes the stringent length and phonics constraints. Experimental results show that Eval-GCSC closely aligns with human evaluations. Under this metric, ChatGPT's performance is comparable to traditional token-level classification models (TCM), demonstrating its potential as a CSC tool. The source code and scripts can be accessed at https://github.com/ktlKTL/Eval-GCSC.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Cite this paper

@article{li2023evalgcsc,
  title  = {Eval-GCSC: A New Metric for Evaluating ChatGPT's Performance in Chinese Spelling Correction},
  author = {Kunting Li and Yong Hu and Shaolei Wang and Hanhan Ma and Liang He and Fandong Meng and Jie Zhou},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.08219},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08219v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.08219.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.08219)

Discussion