Studying Artist Sentiments around AI-generated Artwork

Safinah Ali, Cynthia Breazeal
11/22/2023
cs.HCcs.AIcs.SI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Art created using generated Artificial Intelligence has taken the world by storm and generated excitement for many digital creators and technologists. However, the reception and reaction from artists have been mixed. Concerns about plagiarizing their artworks and styles for datasets and uncertainty around the future of digital art sparked movements in artist communities shunning the use of AI for generating art and protecting artists' rights. Collaborating with these tools for novel creative use cases also sparked hope from some creators. Artists are an integral stakeholder in the rapidly evolving digital creativity industry and understanding their concerns and hopes inform responsible development and use of creativity support tools. In this work, we study artists' sentiments about AI-generated art. We interviewed 7 artists and analyzed public posts from artists on social media platforms Reddit, Twitter and Artstation. We report artists' main concerns and hopes around AI-generated artwork, informing a way forward for inclusive development of these tools.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{ali2023studying,
  title  = {Studying Artist Sentiments around AI-generated Artwork},
  author = {Safinah Ali and Cynthia Breazeal},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.13725},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.13725v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.13725.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.13725)

Discussion