Analysis of the expected L₂ error of an over-parametrized deep neural network estimate learned by gradient descent without regularization

Selina Drews, Michael Kohler
11/24/2023
stat.MLcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recent results show that estimates defined by over-parametrized deep neural networks learned by applying gradient descent to a regularized empirical $L_2$ risk are universally consistent and achieve good rates of convergence. In this paper, we show that the regularization term is not necessary to obtain similar results. In the case of a suitably chosen initialization of the network, a suitable number of gradient descent steps, and a suitable step size we show that an estimate without a regularization term is universally consistent for bounded predictor variables. Additionally, we show that if the regression function is Hölder smooth with Hölder exponent $1/2 \leq p \leq 1$, the $L_2$ error converges to zero with a convergence rate of approximately $n^{-1/(1+d)}$. Furthermore, in case of an interaction model, where the regression function consists of a sum of Hölder smooth functions with $d^*$ components, a rate of convergence is derived which does not depend on the input dimension $d$.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{drews2023analysis,
  title  = {Analysis of the expected L₂ error of an over-parametrized deep neural network estimate learned by gradient descent without regularization},
  author = {Selina Drews and Michael Kohler},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.14609},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14609v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.14609.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.14609)

Discussion