Radiology-Aware Model-Based Evaluation Metric for Report Generation

Amos Calamida, Farhad Nooralahzadeh, Morteza Rohanian, Koji Fujimoto, Mizuho Nishio +1 more
11/28/2023
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper. 4 possible matches can be shown below.

Abstract

We propose a new automated evaluation metric for machine-generated radiology reports using the successful COMET architecture adapted for the radiology domain. We train and publish four medically-oriented model checkpoints, including one trained on RadGraph, a radiology knowledge graph. Our results show that our metric correlates moderately to high with established metrics such as BERTscore, BLEU, and CheXbert scores. Furthermore, we demonstrate that one of our checkpoints exhibits a high correlation with human judgment, as assessed using the publicly available annotations of six board-certified radiologists, using a set of 200 reports. We also performed our own analysis gathering annotations with two radiologists on a collection of 100 reports. The results indicate the potential effectiveness of our method as a radiology-specific evaluation metric. The code, data, and model checkpoints to reproduce our findings will be publicly available.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. 4 weaker matches are hidden by default — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{calamida2023radiologyaware,
  title  = {Radiology-Aware Model-Based Evaluation Metric for Report Generation},
  author = {Amos Calamida and Farhad Nooralahzadeh and Morteza Rohanian and Koji Fujimoto and Mizuho Nishio and Michael Krauthammer},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.16764},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16764v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.16764.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.16764)

Discussion