A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography

Noëmi Aepli, Chantal Amrhein, Florian Schottmann, Rico Sennrich
11/28/2023
cs.CL

Official code: textshuttle/dialect_eval (3 stars, last commit 2024-02-16). 1 more implementation below.

Abstract

For sensible progress in natural language processing, it is important that we are aware of the limitations of the evaluation metrics we use. In this work, we evaluate how robust metrics are to non-standardized dialects, i.e. spelling differences in language varieties that do not have a standard orthography. To investigate this, we collect a dataset of human translations and human judgments for automatic machine translations from English to two Swiss German dialects. We further create a challenge set for dialect variation and benchmark existing metrics' performances. Our results show that existing metrics cannot reliably evaluate Swiss German text generation outputs, especially on segment level. We propose initial design adaptations that increase robustness in the face of non-standardized dialects, although there remains much room for further improvement. The dataset, code, and models are available here: https://github.com/textshuttle/dialect_eval

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(2)

Official code for "A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography"

32Shell, PythonOct 18, 20232 years ago
CC-BY-SA-4.0

NTREX -- News Test References for MT Evaluation

8717Oct 31, 20222 years agoCC-BY-SA-4.0

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{aepli2023benchmark,
  title  = {A Benchmark for Evaluating Machine Translation Metrics on Dialects Without Standard Orthography},
  author = {Noëmi Aepli and Chantal Amrhein and Florian Schottmann and Rico Sennrich},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.16865},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16865v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.16865.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.16865)

Discussion