FFT: Towards Harmlessness Evaluation and Analysis for LLMs with Factuality, Fairness, Toxicity

Shiyao Cui, Zhenyu Zhang, Yilong Chen, Wenyuan Zhang, Tianyun Liu +2 more
11/30/2023
cs.CLcs.CR

No official code found. Best implementation: cuishiyao96/FFT (8 stars, last commit 2024-03-31).

Abstract

The widespread of generative artificial intelligence has heightened concerns about the potential harms posed by AI-generated texts, primarily stemming from factoid, unfair, and toxic content. Previous researchers have invested much effort in assessing the harmlessness of generative language models. However, existing benchmarks are struggling in the era of large language models (LLMs), due to the stronger language generation and instruction following capabilities, as well as wider applications. In this paper, we propose FFT, a new benchmark with 2116 elaborated-designed instances, for LLM harmlessness evaluation with factuality, fairness, and toxicity. To investigate the potential harms of LLMs, we evaluate 9 representative LLMs covering various parameter scales, training stages, and creators. Experiments show that the harmlessness of LLMs is still under-satisfactory, and extensive analysis derives some insightful findings that could inspire future research for harmless LLM research.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

cuishiyao96/FFTCommunity100%

Benchmark for LLM Harmlessness Evaluation with Factuality, Fairness and Toxicity

80Nov 28, 20232 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{cui2023fft,
  title  = {FFT: Towards Harmlessness Evaluation and Analysis for LLMs with Factuality, Fairness, Toxicity},
  author = {Shiyao Cui and Zhenyu Zhang and Yilong Chen and Wenyuan Zhang and Tianyun Liu and Siqi Wang and Tingwen Liu},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2311.18580},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18580v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2311.18580.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2311.18580)

Discussion