REDUCR: Robust Data Downsampling Using Class Priority Reweighting

William Bankes, George Hughes, Ilija Bogunovic, Zi Wang
12/1/2023

No official code found. Best implementation: williambankes/REDUCR (2 stars, last commit 2024-10-08).

Abstract

Modern machine learning models are becoming increasingly expensive to train for real-world image and text classification tasks, where massive web-scale data is collected in a streaming fashion. To reduce the training cost, online batch selection techniques have been developed to choose the most informative datapoints. However, these techniques can suffer from poor worst-class generalization performance due to class imbalance and distributional shifts. This work introduces REDUCR, a robust and efficient data downsampling method that uses class priority reweighting. REDUCR reduces the training data while preserving worst-class generalization performance. REDUCR assigns priority weights to datapoints in a class-aware manner using an online learning algorithm. We demonstrate the data efficiency and robust performance of REDUCR on vision and text classification tasks. On web-scraped datasets with imbalanced class distributions, REDUCR significantly improves worst-class test accuracy (and average accuracy), surpassing state-of-the-art methods by around 15%.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations(1)

Github repo for REDUCR: Robust Data Downsampling using Class Priority Reweighting

21Shell, PythonOct 8, 20242 years ago

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{bankes2023reducr,
  title  = {REDUCR: Robust Data Downsampling Using Class Priority Reweighting},
  author = {William Bankes and George Hughes and Ilija Bogunovic and Zi Wang},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2312.00486},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00486},
  journal = {NEURIPS 2023 2023}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2312.00486.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2312.00486)

Discussion