Guaranteed Trust Region Optimization via Two-Phase KL Penalization

K. R. Zentner, Ujjwal Puri, Zhehui Huang, Gaurav S. Sukhatme
12/8/2023
cs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

On-policy reinforcement learning (RL) has become a popular framework for solving sequential decision problems due to its computational efficiency and theoretical simplicity. Some on-policy methods guarantee every policy update is constrained to a trust region relative to the prior policy to ensure training stability. These methods often require computationally intensive non-linear optimization or require a particular form of action distribution. In this work, we show that applying KL penalization alone is nearly sufficient to enforce such trust regions. Then, we show that introducing a "fixup" phase is sufficient to guarantee a trust region is enforced on every policy update while adding fewer than 5% additional gradient steps in practice. The resulting algorithm, which we call FixPO, is able to train a variety of policy architectures and action spaces, is easy to implement, and produces results competitive with other trust region methods.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zentner2023guaranteed,
  title  = {Guaranteed Trust Region Optimization via Two-Phase KL Penalization},
  author = {K. R. Zentner and Ujjwal Puri and Zhehui Huang and Gaurav S. Sukhatme},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2312.05405},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05405v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2312.05405.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2312.05405)

Discussion