Beyond Top-Class Agreement: Using Divergences to Forecast Performance under Distribution Shift

Mona Schirmer, Dan Zhang, Eric Nalisnick
12/13/2023
cs.LGcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Knowing if a model will generalize to data 'in the wild' is crucial for safe deployment. To this end, we study model disagreement notions that consider the full predictive distribution - specifically disagreement based on Hellinger distance, Jensen-Shannon and Kullback-Leibler divergence. We find that divergence-based scores provide better test error estimates and detection rates on out-of-distribution data compared to their top-1 counterparts. Experiments involve standard vision and foundation models.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{schirmer2023beyond,
  title  = {Beyond Top-Class Agreement: Using Divergences to Forecast Performance under Distribution Shift},
  author = {Mona Schirmer and Dan Zhang and Eric Nalisnick},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2312.08033},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.08033v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2312.08033.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2312.08033)

Discussion