Clinical Text Deduplication Practices for Efficient Pretraining and Improved Clinical Tasks

Isotta Landi, Eugenia Alleva, Alissa A. Valentine, Lauren A. Lepow, Alexander W. Charney
9/29/2023
cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Despite being a unique source of information on patients' status and disease progression, clinical notes are characterized by high levels of duplication and information redundancy. In general domain text, it has been shown that deduplication does not harm language model (LM) pretraining, thus helping reduce the training cost. Although large LMs have proven to learn medical knowledge, they still require specialized domain adaptation for improved downstream clinical tasks. By leveraging large real-world clinical corpora, we first provided a fine-grained characterization of duplicates stemming from common writing practices and clinical relevancy. Second, we demonstrated that deduplicating clinical text can help clinical LMs encode less redundant information in a more efficient manner and do not harm classification tasks via prompt-based learning.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{landi2023clinical,
  title  = {Clinical Text Deduplication Practices for Efficient Pretraining and Improved Clinical Tasks},
  author = {Isotta Landi and Eugenia Alleva and Alissa A. Valentine and Lauren A. Lepow and Alexander W. Charney},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2312.09469},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.09469v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2312.09469.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2312.09469)

Discussion