Deep Learning-based Sentiment Classification: A Comparative Survey

Mohamed Kayed, Rebeca P. Díaz-Redondo, Alhassan Mabrouk
12/12/2023
cs.CLcs.AI

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Recently, Deep Learning (DL) approaches have been applied to solve the Sentiment Classification (SC) problem, which is a core task in reviews mining or Sentiment Analysis (SA). The performances of these approaches are affected by different factors. This paper addresses these factors and classifies them into three categories: data preparation based factors, feature representation based factors and the classification techniques based factors. The paper is a comprehensive literature-based survey that compares the performance of more than 100 DL-based SC approaches by using 21 public datasets of reviews given by customers within three specific application domains (products, movies and restaurants). These 21 datasets have different characteristics (balanced/imbalanced, size, etc.) to give a global vision for our study. The comparison explains how the proposed factors quantitatively affect the performance of the studied DL-based SC approaches.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{kayed2023deep,
  title  = {Deep Learning-based Sentiment Classification: A Comparative Survey},
  author = {Mohamed Kayed and Rebeca P. Díaz-Redondo and Alhassan Mabrouk},
  year   = {2023},
  eprint = {2312.17253},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17253v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2312.17253.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2312.17253)

Discussion