Credible Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detection in Open Scene

Jingyu Zhuang, Kuo Wang, Liang Lin, Guanbin Li
1/1/2024
cs.CV

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Semi-Supervised Object Detection (SSOD) has achieved resounding success by leveraging unlabeled data to improve detection performance. However, in Open Scene Semi-Supervised Object Detection (O-SSOD), unlabeled data may contains unknown objects not observed in the labeled data, which will increase uncertainty in the model's predictions for known objects. It is detrimental to the current methods that mainly rely on self-training, as more uncertainty leads to the lower localization and classification precision of pseudo labels. To this end, we propose Credible Teacher, an end-to-end framework. Credible Teacher adopts an interactive teaching mechanism using flexible labels to prevent uncertain pseudo labels from misleading the model and gradually reduces its uncertainty through the guidance of other credible pseudo labels. Empirical results have demonstrated our method effectively restrains the adverse effect caused by O-SSOD and significantly outperforms existing counterparts.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{zhuang2024credible,
  title  = {Credible Teacher for Semi-Supervised Object Detection in Open Scene},
  author = {Jingyu Zhuang and Kuo Wang and Liang Lin and Guanbin Li},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.00695},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00695v2}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.00695.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.00695)

Discussion