Can AI Write Classical Chinese Poetry like Humans? An Empirical Study Inspired by Turing Test

Zekun Deng, Hao Yang, Jun Wang
1/10/2024
cs.CL

No confident code implementation found for this paper.

Abstract

Some argue that the essence of humanity, such as creativity and sentiment, can never be mimicked by machines. This paper casts doubt on this belief by studying a vital question: Can AI compose poetry as well as humans? To answer the question, we propose ProFTAP, a novel evaluation framework inspired by Turing test to assess AI's poetry writing capability. We apply it on current large language models (LLMs) and find that recent LLMs do indeed possess the ability to write classical Chinese poems nearly indistinguishable from those of humans. We also reveal that various open-source LLMs can outperform GPT-4 on this task.

View on arXivView PDF

Code Implementations

No confident code match yet

We couldn't find an author-owned or strongly-evidenced community implementation for this paper. Any repos shown below are weak matches — verify before relying on them.

No code implementations found yet.

Know of an implementation? Let us know in the comments below!

Similar Papers

Cite this paper

@article{deng2024write,
  title  = {Can AI Write Classical Chinese Poetry like Humans? An Empirical Study Inspired by Turing Test},
  author = {Zekun Deng and Hao Yang and Jun Wang},
  year   = {2024},
  eprint = {2401.04952},
  archivePrefix = {arXiv},
  url    = {http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04952v1}
}

Add a badge to your README

Shows whether official code is linked for this paper.

Code of Paper badge
[![Code of Paper](https://codeofpaper.com/badge/2401.04952.svg)](https://codeofpaper.com/paper/2401.04952)

Discussion